Insights & Perspectives

Expert insights on GRC, AI, ESG, risk management, and business transformation.

The two crises that erupted simultaneously within Indonesia’s healthcare sector in April–May 2026 should be understood as a single message: the system is not experiencing isolated accidents—it is suffering from a design failure.

The death of dr. Myta Aprilia Azmy, an internship doctor who reportedly worked continuous emergency shifts without adequate rest before dying from severe lung infection, and the IDR 866 billion in suspected fraudulent claims identified by BPJS Kesehatan, are not disconnected events. Both emerged from the same governance ecosystem—one dependent on reactive regulation, episodic oversight, and fragmented accountability without clear ownership.

The government has responded. The Ministry of Health introduced a 40-hour weekly limit for internship doctors, expanded leave rights, and formed a joint investigation team. These measures deserve recognition as important signals of intent.

But crisis-driven patchwork reforms are insufficient to repair a structurally fragile system. What Indonesia needs is a gradual, measurable, and sustainable healthcare governance reform agenda—not another cycle of reactive policies waiting for the next tragedy to expose their weaknesses.

This article outlines five Governance, Risk, Compliance (GRC), and sustainability reforms that could serve as a roadmap for the Ministry of Health and regional governments to ensure that tragedies like dr. Myta’s death are never repeated, while addressing the deeper disorder within Indonesia’s healthcare governance.

1. Establish Binding and Continuously Verified Hospital GRC Standards

The core problem is not the absence of regulation, but the fact that compliance is verified only periodically.

As of December 2024, 96 percent of Indonesia’s 3,216 hospitals were accredited, and 85.1 percent held “Paripurna,” the country’s highest accreditation rating. Yet these achievements failed to prevent doctors from working under dangerous conditions behind the walls of “certified” institutions.

Three-year accreditation cycles, reactive BPJS claim audits, and occasional Ministry inspections create dangerously long gaps between verification points.

The Ministry of Health and the Hospital Accreditation Commission must therefore establish hospital GRC standards subject to continuous verification rather than episodic review.

Concretely, this means:

  • Requiring all hospitals to establish genuinely independent Internal Audit Units (SPI), reporting directly to supervisory boards rather than hospital directors. These units should produce quarterly reports accessible to regulators.
  • Integrating healthcare worker welfare and safety indicators into clinical quality indicators assessed during accreditation surveys, making workforce conditions measurable operational requirements rather than merely ethical expectations.

International standards such as Joint Commission International and Australia’s Hospital Accreditation Program already incorporate staff well-being into quality assessments. Indonesia should adopt similar approaches.

2. Build a Real Workforce Risk Management System

International Organization for Standardization, through ISO 31000:2018, requires organizations to identify, assess, and continuously monitor risks affecting human resources.

In the context of medical internships, this means the Ministry of Health must require every internship hospital to implement structured participant-monitoring protocols, including:

  • Mandatory health evaluations at least every three months.
  • Audited enforcement of working-hour limits, not merely symbolic policies.
  • Sick leave mechanisms that can be activated without extending internship periods as punishment.

For type C and D regional hospitals—where high JKN patient volumes coincide with severe shortages of permanent doctors—the Ministry should also establish minimum ratios between permanent physicians and internship doctors as a condition for accreditation as internship facilities.

Without such requirements, internship doctors will continue functioning as unofficial substitutes for permanent staff—the very structural condition that contributed to dr. Myta’s death.

Regional governments, as owners of public hospitals, must fulfill these obligations through binding partnership agreements, with sanctions including suspension of internship-facility status for noncompliance.

3. Mandate Multi-Layered Speak-Up Mechanisms Protected from Retaliation

dr. Myta reportedly chose not to report her deteriorating condition because she was afraid.

That fear was not an individual weakness. It was evidence of a system that failed to provide safe reporting channels.

In modern GRC frameworks, whistleblower and speak-up mechanisms are not optional additions—they are frontline risk-prevention tools.

The Ministry of Health should require every internship facility and hospital to operate dual reporting channels simultaneously:

  • An internal reporting line to the Internal Audit Unit (SPI).
  • An external reporting channel directly to provincial health offices or the Ministry through encrypted and anonymous digital platforms.

The platform servaninsip.net—which internship participants reportedly used to submit criticisms before being summoned by supervisors to explain their comments—should be transformed into an officially protected national complaint platform operated by the Ministry itself.

Any retaliation against whistleblowers should be categorized as a governance violation affecting accreditation status.

Without structural protection for those who speak up, no early-warning system will function effectively, regardless of how sophisticated regulations appear on paper.

4. Integrate Real-Time Data Systems for Early Detection of JKN Fraud

JKN fraud schemes worth hundreds of billions of rupiah annually—from phantom billing to manipulated ICU ventilator claims—cannot be addressed solely through investigation teams deployed after losses occur.

What Indonesia needs is a real-time, data-driven early detection system.

The Ministry of Health, BPJS Kesehatan, and the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs must collaborate to create full interoperability between:

  • Hospital Information Management Systems (SIMRS)
  • BPJS claim systems
  • Electronic medical records

With integrated data, anomalies such as service claims lacking medical documentation or procedures exceeding hospital capacity can be detected within days rather than months after payment.

Regional governments, as owners of public hospitals, are responsible for ensuring that hospitals under their authority adopt standardized and interoperable SIMRS platforms.

This is not merely a technology investment. It is an investment in the integrity of the JKN system that serves more than 218 million Indonesians.

The cumulative fraud losses exceeding IDR 100 billion from 50 cases since 2024 are already far greater than the cost of the required digital transformation.

5. Make Healthcare Worker Well-Being a National Sustainability Indicator

Within Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks, the “Social” dimension includes labor protection, fair working conditions, and the prevention of exploitation.

Indonesia’s healthcare system—by structurally placing young doctors in vulnerable conditions without adequate protection—has repeatedly violated these principles.

The consequences extend beyond individual victims. They erode the long-term foundation of Indonesia’s healthcare human capital.

The Ministry of Health should therefore publish an annual Health Sector Sustainability Report containing measurable indicators such as:

  • Burnout and fatigue rates among healthcare workers
  • Doctor-to-population ratios by district and municipality
  • Internship facility compliance with workload standards
  • JKN fraud trends across healthcare facility categories

Such reports should not function merely as accountability documents. They should serve as national risk-management instruments, enabling regulators to identify vulnerabilities before they escalate into crises.

Countries such as the United Kingdom, through NHS England, and Australia, through the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, have long published similar data-driven reports as foundations for evidence-based health policy.

Reform Must Be Gradual—Not Reactive

None of these recommendations require entirely new legislation.

All can be implemented within existing frameworks: KARS accreditation standards, internship regulations, the 2023 Health Law, and presidential regulations governing JKN.

What is required is a shift in oversight philosophy:

  • from periodic to continuous supervision,
  • from reactive to anticipatory governance, and
  • from compliance-as-certification to compliance-as-culture.

The death of dr. Myta and the billions lost through JKN fraud did not occur because Indonesia lacks regulations.

They occurred because existing regulations lack living monitoring mechanisms between formal verification points.

Fixing this is not the responsibility of a single ministry, a single policy, or a single administration. It is a systemic project that must begin now, be measured continuously, and continue long after public attention shifts elsewhere.

Because a healthcare system incapable of protecting its own healthcare workers will never truly be capable of protecting the society it serves.

Tags:

No responses yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *